Can Pediatricians Provide Long-Acting Reversible Contraception?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In the United States, 40% of high-school students have sex; few use highly effective and safe long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs): intrauterine devices and implants. Pediatricians are key health providers for many adolescents, yet few provide LARCs. Our objective was to understand the pragmatics of provision of LARCs (rather than beliefs or attitudes) and identify barriers to and opportunities for LARC provision by community-practicing pediatricians. DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews. Qualitative methods are valuable for generating conceptual models of complex phenomena. SETTING: Set in a midsized Midwestern city, our study was community-based. PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We interviewed 23 pediatricians to understand their views about providing contraception (including LARCs) to adolescents. For analysis, we developed a coding schema and applied it using a priori and open coding. RESULTS: Several inter-related themes regarding challenges to provision of LARC emerged: limited motivation for on-site LARC provision or referral streams, low pediatric patient interest in LARC, lack of pediatrician training about LARC provision, and inadequate structural elements for on-site placement of LARCs in pediatric offices. Each challenge could be remedied, because pediatricians were motivated to provide adolescent patients with high-quality care. Improvements in these inter-related conditions could facilitate pediatrician provision of LARC. CONCLUSION: Pediatricians and their patients want to prevent pregnancy, but current practice norms limit LARC provision by pediatricians. To increase LARC access in pediatrician offices, we suggest training in LARC provision and patient education for medical students, residents, and pediatricians; communicating about LARC methods with adolescents to increase patient demand; and systemic changes to improve referral processes and/or allow on-site LARC placements.

Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescents' Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives.

Most pregnancies among teenagers are unintended and many can be attributed to contraception misuse or nonuse. The etonogestrel implant and intrauterine devices, referred to as long-acting reversible contraceptives, or LARCs, are the most effective reversible contraceptive methods. These methods are safe for use by adolescents, yet the number of LARC users remains low among adolescents in the United States. In this review we examine recent literature about barriers and facilitators to LARC use among adolescent women. Factors that influence decision-making and provision are organized into 4 categories: (1) cost and clinical operations; (2) adolescent awareness and attitudes; (3) confidentiality, consent, and parental attitudes; and (4) health care provider knowledge, attitudes, and counseling. Knowledge deficits and misconceptions among adolescents and their health care providers are key barriers to adolescent LARC use.

Pediatricians' Attitudes and Beliefs about Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Influence Counseling.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Adolescents are at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Because of pediatricians' potential role in contraceptive counseling, understanding their attitudes and beliefs and counseling practices about use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC; ie, etonogestrel implant and intrauterine devices [IUDs]) is vital. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We interviewed primary care pediatricians (N = 23) in a Midwestern city in June-August 2014. We transcribed the interviews, developed a coding schema, and analyzed these qualitative data using a priori and open coding of transcripts. RESULTS: Few pediatricians had favorable views on adolescent IUD use and most did not include IUDs in routine contraception counseling. Pediatricians perceived IUDs to impose significant risks for adverse reproductive outcomes and to be poorly tolerated by adolescents. Poor and/or outdated knowledge influenced inaccurate beliefs and unsupportive attitudes. Whereas some pediatricians were advocates for adolescent use of IUDs, many others had concerns that IUDs were not appropriate and not favored by adolescents. In contrast, participants viewed the etonogestrel implant more favorably and often included it in routine counseling. Some pediatricians focused on the familiar and readily available methods (injectable and oral contraceptives) or assumed patients had predetermined expectations for those methods. Time spent counseling on LARC was also perceived as a barrier. Pediatricians described how education and increased familiarity with LARC changed viewpoints. CONCLUSION: A variety of beliefs and attitudes, as well as factors such as time and personal habits, influence pediatricians' contraceptive counseling practices. Until knowledge deficits are addressed, uninformed viewpoints and unfavorable attitudes will limit adolescents' access to LARC, especially IUDs.